I intend to launch any directory of farmers in great britan, US, Europe and Questions.
Initially POST thought it would be better to possess them all in one directory character.com However I appeared to be thinking that only have character.co.british, farmer.us all, farmer.ca and farmer.com.au then each service would can better while each might have local relevant content which in turn would increase its position and would likely appeal much more to consumers since simply people in UK may wish to search for UK farmers.
But then I had been thinking which my generic global producing blog is relevant to be able to each web-site.
Thus would likely the optimum be to possess SPECIFIC DIRECTORY/SPECIFIC CONTENT/SHARED WEBSITE on every single site If so how does the shape work – will there be a way to publish a similar blog about each site
Good idea around the Geo unique Names for every market.
One tiny snag, this.com.au combination could/would be an issue for non-aussie documented company.
anyone in addition agree how the geo-specific names are wise I can see some web sites advise that will splitting is bad, but there’s no doubt that it seems sensible for local search
i would suggest keeping stuff as centralized as you possibly can.simple, no bureaucracy, easier system to regulate.
if you truly own player.com, i never get dui attorney las vegas wouldn’t need to develop in which.that’s any terrific website name considering exactly what you’re wanting to develop.developing a.com is best for indexing compared to those second item options.