it is possible to best way to make this happen.. use javascript for you to display it
adobe flash =! seo
Fundamentally. The usual alternative they certainly is provide some sort of non-flash version of this site (which is truly a good idea, the flash is absolutely necessary). Of training course, no flash whatsoever might be much better.
There are wide ranging problems. For case, each page of an HTML site may be optimized around an alternative keyword. Search applications, even if these people index a flash file, see it mutually big page — with one list of keywords.
Try a hybrid site, split off the particular text into HTML CODE and add the particular Flash via a new javascript technique. Those who have javascript not power on or no flash player see a pleasant looking site. People that have the extras see the extras.
Certainly, progressive enhancement is a best path inside any situation. Your site should be in (X)HTML+CSS. Javascript and Flash needs to be optional.
(Says whomever whose current job revolves around creating a Javascript-based webapp )
Google Unobtrusive Flash Objects – a progressive technique for accomplishing this finish.
But it really does still mean plenty of reworking… it seriously depends. I declare, if full-Flash can be avoided (which is 95% of the case), then it’s better off just simply without Flash.
Webapp, not website. It’s ok for webapps to obtain dependencies.
Meh. 99. 9% of webapps’ can be written as sites with progressive enlargement and related different goodies. The ugliness we manage every day makes me think it may not be necessarily worth them.
You can not be stuck on Flash if your main concern is actually SEO. When I have a client that will… strongly requests flash that they are implemented, because they Googled " what in the event you get with the website", I employ plain HTML in div tags, and then, overwrite it together with javascript and carry out my Flash subject. Of course, if the user has javascript incompetent, then they will see the nice, unsightly HTML. I think the search engines will get annoyed with this later on, but so a long way, I haven’t recently been blacklisted, and the clients I repeat this to have some sort of noticable increase in their stats. I was wanting that bots may possibly detect the XML from the Flash soon, as most of my Flash materials are XML earned. A couple of in years past, I heard that was going to be able to happen, anyone over heard anything yet
There is no good reason for your search engine for you to penalize you regarding giving it textual content that you show an individual, but in some other format.
They will shouldn’t. But it might be considered one of people keyword busting hackers. What if I did this to the many images on my site, and applied the text that will fill keywords. It wouldn’t mean the particular image, video, or maybe other media would likely contain the copy value. And considering the limited number with users with javascript incompetent, the search engines may, eventually, feel that is the similar SEO hack to having all of the keywords mounted on the top of the page while in the same color for the reason that background and set to 1px, or maybe the newer margin-left: -1000px. I am not positive, but I’ve heard they look down upon these attemps. I do consider you Shadow, but using javascript alternates is not the same as using alt tags or something akin to that.
Good, to be trustworthy, I think the search engines probably search with the pattern of keyword stuffing, rather versus the methodology of hiding it. That is to say, I think they seek out people deliberately clustering keywords as an alternative to text that has the same color as the particular background.
That they do. I don’t think bad about by using technique at most of. But I cane easily see where it could be abused.