Since these folks who write pertaining to these blogs and such are usually leaders in our profession, should one interpret this for evolution in design acceptance like now more prevalent using 960-980 pixel sites rather than just a shorter time ago
Only geeky developers that have some sort of " power trip" have
unless anyone is troubleshooting a website and they really don’t want any
distractions the result of JS.
The one part that is likely to be an issue is usually with accessibility (disabled consumers that
use other unusual browsers as well as software). As long since you keep JS options
then it degrades gracefully, keep in mind to always incorporate all users.
operations (like navigation) with regard to it fails gracefully along with the site is even now usable.
JSQuery, LightBox, the list goes on and on… JS is so important for some applications.
That may be my 2 pennies.
ROFL!: chuckle: but quite legitimate!
We would agree to of which! Some websites requirements JS badly so it won’t perform best if it’s not constructed from JS. But a few don’t.
The same can be stated for Flash, to tell the truth — it had been abused for useless purposes quickly, and now it can be slowly gaining quite a few respect when it’s used in the right destinations. It’s all about choosing the ultimate place to utilize a technology, instead of deploying it everywhere just because it’s shiny.
Now what should sign the discussion is actually whether Ajax look actually does anything for users. (That is through user diagnostic tests, not the developer’s private preference or as the resume demands Mootools along with Jquery).
" Since we can" is usually a terrible reason to try and do anything. Same having " Monkey-see, Monkey-do. " Time period to dabble with user psychology and start testing just about all this magnificent " look, " before it becomes as big bull crap as DHTML ever was. Start that has a big fat apology for the people flash-turbating, because I’m seeing equally much ajaxturbation taking place ,.
" DHTML" is just not AJAX; not sure how people usually bridged that plausible gap.