Undecided if that’s the correct terminology. I’m only getting into all this website design stuff. Great progress for me considering all I had ever used the pc for ended up being browsing.
I’m utilizing a pagebuilder but I’ve noticed there are actually so many with you doing many of the nitty gritty material. I’m beginning in order to wonder if I’ve any to be here in the least. aranoid:
It really is good to contain the knowledge of easy methods to code in xhtml/html, so that if you have to make a subtle change you are able to, without all the trouble of opening upward some mighty app just to tweak a range or 2.
Alternatively the web style and design tools are great these days, although some do include unnecessary markup.
Me personally, I prefer to complete hand-code.
You’re surely welcome below, this is never a hand program code only forum. In time you’ll see for you to have learned some code, then an increasing number of, etc…
I dislike page builders and wysiwyg editors. I used to be brought up having html and WHEN I hand code every little thing, i find by and large dreamweaver and programs prefer that give me additional problems, either as a consequence of browser incompatibility or maybe it makes code which i don’t like.
Nowadays though many webdesigners are getting away together with using pagebuilders with little or no html experience.
I would suggest in order to get into webdesign a person learn html as well as CSS, both go together and are a piece of cake to learn.
I’ve never actually used a WYSIWYG for anything in addition to site management. I don’t know whether I prefer hand coding or not, I just take action that way anyhow.
Good items. I started a html course a couple weeks ago but haven’t much done much from it. I’ve six months to complete it in so I am a bit very lazy. But I concur, it’s a will need to have. There have been lots of times I’ve needed to change little things and I can spend ages thinking about the html code and changing different aspects of it because I have no idea which part I’m designed to change.
POST tried this away, on my site pondered coded it after which used a wysiwyg editor and also the one i give coded was. 56 times less proportions than one which the wysiwyg manager made
Infiniti, that could make a big difference I suppose regarding site like mine that may increase in size a whole lot I think. We have a directory regarding suppliers and WHEN I assign a web page per supplier. Then I’m hoping to perform different advertising options too, some of which would take considerably of space.
I should probably get a pro to consider it soon.
I hand code my site… I employ DW as HTML DOCUMENT editor (not because WYSIWYG)
Im a notepad supporter
I’m along guys/gals, I am a notepad coder but I think WYSIWYG still provides it’s place regarding common users.
I use Dreamweaver but 99% of that time period I’m in the particular Code view, not the structure view.
You’re crazy to make use of Notepad, no matter what you think of WYSIWYG editors. With no programmed indentation, and absolutely no color coding or perhaps code popups, you’re from the mind and simply just losing productivity. This doesn’t happen make you any better of an coder to put it to use.
Can you use Dreamweaver to create PHP dynamic web sites with PHP program code embedded
in the pages Whenever you can, then I guess I’d personally use Dreamweaver at all times.
I never thought you can make dynamic internet pages with Dreamweaver.
+1000000
I’m undecided I’m following!
You can create PHP web sites (in code view) and it also highlights the program code properly. There can be no tag insight for PHP tho… Unless there’s an extension somewhere to the!
Well… I hand program code my pages with Notepad and still have PHP scripting often mixed in
with the HTML or PHP generated pages (100% dynamic). I’ll hand-code with
Notepad, transfer my page over (with FTP) and test drive it immediately to decide if it works.
Because of the page is PHP and it also takes my service provider to process this script, I get to
test drive it online. That’s why I don’t utilize Dreamweaver… you are unable to view your webpage
with Dreamweaver when it is just a PHP script rather than a static web page.
So, I don’t discover the point throughout using Dreamweaver unless online pages you usually are making
are static webpages. In that event, Dreamweaver would be the great thing to use.
None in the sites I help to make anymore are static. None in the clients I improve want
static pages… everything is dynamically caused to become from MySQL, or maybe online directories
by using multiple images and also text content.
Is there much point of making use of Dreamweaver unless it might process PHP scripting
It’s unlikely that any of my websites I make are generally static either! I use PHP also but with DW, I’ll work directly there are various server
Need not save the track, ftp it more than, reload browser.
Only save file, reload cell phone browser
In addition to since PHP is actually server-side language, whatever software exists, you wouldn’t have the ability to run the php script against your box (unless certainly your box is the server)
Agreed, I love Dreamweaver, especially the automatic indentation, tag completion (version 8-10 of DW) and also the color coding assists alot.
Notepad is good unless you care about these handy features, but they actually come in helpful. EditPlus is another good replacement for DW, less intense in the way of features, certainly uses less methods, costs less and works pretty good. Also does color coding in the HTML tags as well to help distinquish signal.
WYSIWYG is actually pretty elementary. I prefer Dreamweaver best.
post hand code (well test anyway, lol) within frontpage. prefer DW nonetheless it slows my laptop down heavly hence i can”t really do it.