I’m relatively new to website development, getting in to help it designing a niche site for a pal. There are about 15 pages into the site in most of, styled with external css style sheets, nothing fancy, quite simply text with photographs.
But, we wanted my friend to be able to make changes towards text, including maybe some embellishments (bolding etc) along with headers, but without them having to know html (other than, say paragraph, h1, h2 etc).
The initial attempt involved getting rid of the text areas as plain text message files, and then topping and tailing these considering the relevant html parts using simple php pieces of software. The theory ended up being that these text files could possibly be edited in notepad or even any simple text editor and the whole site then re-built because of the php scripts.
But – this couldn’t work. We recommended more " wysiwyg-ness" than the plain text data gave. So, we tried a simple wysiwyg editor (CoffeeCup as it happens) to update the. html information. Several issues right here:
- any changes made weren’t reflected in the actual plain text files – so the php system in order to " rebuild website" was no longer possible
- the wysiwyg publisher added an internal css section that include any changes created – and this is specific to each and every separate html track, so losing the relevance on the consistent css file
- there is usually a possibility/danger of this wysiwyg editor transforming the layout (eg, accidentally resizing any block of textual content or an image) again getting faraway from a consitent css-based design sheet.
I’ve played also having a more intricate web-builder (Serif Web-Plus) containing the concept connected with master pages and so could potentially restrict editing to just simply the text areas. But the html files that is generated by this (and by CoffeeCup’s Visual Web-site Designer) again contain the many css-styling internally, so getting away from the thinking behind a consistent external style sheet. Additionally, the Serif system renames each of the image files by using horrendous generated filenames, this means you seem to get rid of " control" around what files are usually where.
I suppose, bottom collection, is how does one create a set of pages inside a website that could be consistently syled using an external css track, but which can be edited in a new wysiwyg fashion, while still giving control with the integrity of coursesmart.
Sorry for the long first publish, but any guidelines, guidance etc might be very gratefully received.
Texty, the best CMS
They’re not really Content Managment Methods, just back ends you may add to any site which has a few minor adjustments. It’s what you would like.
Thanks DC856 for the reply and that links.
I’ve had an easy look, and I reckon " texty" is usually a little too ad hoc for want I’d prefer, but the " cushy" strategy is worth a better look.
Bless you again,
You ought to try iUpdateIt ( http: //www. iUpdateIt. com ) to do what you deserve. It is a simplified CMS that enables an average user kid update " select" spaces with a site. All you decide to do is install this, and then your friend will easily have the capacity to add text, images, upload PDF records, etc… into the site.
Cushy cms is ideal. iUpdate them uses tables and frames.
In fact, iUpdate gives you the code with regard to Tables and iFrames, but you should utilize the link collection in whatever format you would like. It’s a basic " div" so might be installed in whatever creative method you would like. It’s ideal make use of the basic code we ensure that you get, but it is usually flexible enough that they are used however you want.