Hello all, so I’m using some photographs repeatedly throughout any page, the brand new they are used they’re each displayed during there full dimension of 150×150. After actually displayed again through the page at considerably smaller size of 13×13.
I currently have only 1 the full size images around the server, would load times with creation of any smaller thumbnail shots, I cant notice any difference but am interested in increasing load times because site grows. Or is also the images only down loaded once then re-sized by browser
Thanks ahead
They usually are downloaded once, then are cached by the browser.
Consequently, it really will depend on the user’s cell phone cache settings.
Your circumstances becomes a issue for dial-up users (which are becoming fewer and fewer),
however now, for portable (cell phone/PDA/smart phone) consumers… who sometimes pay by
the quantity information they obtain.
It is recommended to have both size available (thumb and full), and probably even
1 in-between (as this full-size for compact screen… mobile users).
It’s always far better to ONLY work the minimum number of bytes that you should serve.
Until you were using the identical file name the browser wouldn’t normally know to use the same image for just a different sized figure.
It is equally not advised to help request the cell phone browser to resize an image in your case. Generally it is best to use photograph editing software precisely as it makes a superior quality thumbnail.
The best way of reducing load times is usually to optimise images – I’ve found http: //www. netmechanic. com/GIFBot/optimize-graphic. htm (not my own , personal site!! ) a useful and free instrument. Others can be within Google.
Is helpful for jpeg images but keep clear about optimising graphics with text overlying these individuals.
Now i am no technical qualified, but when We’ve used the cell phone browser to resize affordable (rather than loading a sizable image and your thumbnail) the thubmnail features looked OK. Surely a 13×13 graphic is small enough to look Ok once resized
I believe it is better to sacrifice the grade of the image just loading time, because visitors might be nervous if your images will get a hold of too slowly.
Nothing worse then anticipating an image to load for the reason that ‘designer’ didn’t recognize who to optimize images for that web. If I understand that you’re using the very same image over multiple times, as long as being the path, the name connected with image stays the same, it just loads once.
true story. Image insert times = demise.