Redirecting – Does Google Penalize?

I’ve truly bought 2 domains to get a client, the same name but some may be. com and one other. co. uk.

We’re not using the. com but bought it if anyone accidentally types from the. com extension. Hence, I need that will re-direct the internet page.

I’ve this code: < meta HTTP-EQUIV=" REFRESH" content=" 0; url=http: //www. yourdomain. com/index. html" > which I’m told will get the job done but I only wondered whether Google penalizes websites for redirections like this the slightest bit.

I’ve SEO’d the. corp. uk site and don’t prefer to damage the rankings at all.

Thank you

Don’t redirect…

No apart from penalize(per say). They just won’t index your site because they don’t follow redirects.

Just setup hosting in order that it has both domains resolving to the same location… Subsequently do a. htaccess rule ( if your on Linux ), to re-write the URL to the one you wish to use.

You never want the internet site indexed on equally domains because serps will then discover duplicate content…. The mod-rewrite is the very best of handling this particular..

Whenever its a window server.. Running asp… I’d do a check at the page level… Discover what URL was requested… Do the " redirect" on the correct domain… A few 2008 servers assistance the. htaccess mod-rewrite policies, but not every one.

Precisely how I would cope with it.

Thank you for that. I was just looking on the euk (my host) forums with the mod-rewrite as I’ve truly not done the following before and happened apon a thread that sort of explained how to accomplish the re-direct but it’s inside a different way to how we suggest.

I was wondering should you could give us your opinion because EUK support includes often given us incorrect advice so I don’t like to rely on their word a lot of! Here’s the hyperlink…

http: //forums. eukhost. com/f27/redirecting-multiple-domains-123-reg-one-domain-hosted-euk-8101/

Thanks a lot!

Yeah, they are everywhere we look, actually talked in relation to several things…

Hears the deal, all this really depends in 2 things.

Provided, the more you control while using DNA pointer, ( cName), the higher.

But all that depends on your hosting and how it’s launch.

If your host permits you to have multiple websites on the exact same hosting account, I might setup the second domain on the host, then go to the domain appoint registrar and come up with a DNS entry (cName) considering the same ip address since the 1st domain.

When that may be complete, and propogating ( may take two or three hours to observe the change ), you will be able to browse the internet site using either website extension…

Then to scale back the chance associated with " duplicate content" issues that some search engines like google will impose, I might put an. htaccess rule into position to rewrite the URL to the preferred domain.

Because only reason you’ve the second domain is within case someone accidentally types while in the. com instead with. net or using a link in.. This process will address it although it is not offending any serps, as the 2nd domain should never get indexed… ( copy content )… Women and men rewrite rule can handle and unintentional typos.

There are many ways of carrying this out… And if the particular hosting package doesn’t support multiple websites ( some you should not )…

I just now try to steer clear completely from meta-refresh redirects…

Thank you for your assistance. I’ve just looked after this out by my webhost eukhost.

I couldn’t appear to change the CNAMEs average joe on their system in order that they did it to do but I’m uncertain how exactly how they did them. They said many people created the domain for a " standard forward". Have you just about any idea what that means and whether it’ll affect my men’s tour with google

Yahoo and google does actually adhere to 301 redirects, and they’ll deal with a site-level redirect in this case. I haven’t analyzed it on as many levels as Matt outlines from the video below, but I’ve gone 1-2 amounts deep and at this time there has never been an issue getting the appropriate content indexed.

WE haven’t tried the particular meta refresh label and wouldn’t, simply because it may not be a browser-friendly solution and because there are many server-side ways to pull off 301s.

Merely had to make use of a redirect, I’d use the redirect from this really long set of them that pertains to the site I’m working away at. Dude’s covered just about everything you can consider.

That’s really helpful, thank a person. I’ve printed it out for a few bedtime reading!

No issue.

One thing I forgot to say, though… this isn’t a penalty that way, but there is a point where the actual redirect will " overlap" the initial page, which means both will appear in Google Search results. This is due to the fact people often incorrect use the 301 plus redirect permanently after they should be redirecting briefly (a 302 redirect). Which means that you’ll take a new short-term hit inside traffic until Search engines is convinced that this 301 is in truth permanent, and you might want to do two things subsequently:

1) Ensure you get your redirect exactly the method that you want it.
2) Don’t mess by using it or create added redirects. People often panic and anxiety and make items worse when all they need to do is hang on.

Thanks for this, I’ll bear it at heart. It’s a completely new website so to get any idea how far it’ll take Google determine that it’s everlasting Just wondering once i can expect to get started on getting traffic that will it.

Relies upon… when you acquired the. com, was it new or did someone work with it before

Either way, you won’t find traffic to it that you may see, nor will this even be indexed need to make sure it right. The whole point is that you would like to consolidate together domains into to avoid any duplicate content issues. So everything will flow on the. co. uk (as the idea should).

The only real thing you might see while using. com is type-in traffic (if there is a server side fire wood stats package) or even possibly traffic it is possible to clearly determine as being from the aged existing site in case applicable (referrals for search phrases that you certainly not targeted, etc. )

When there is a 301 set up… Even a DNS forward into position… The server logs aren’t going to display anything, unless they ( the particular hosting provider ) is definitely using something I’m not alert to…

Motive being, server logs are generally basically event firelogs that log entry to files… But when there is a 301 set up, or a DNS forwards or pointer into position, those files should never be accessed except by the end point… A DNS ahead or pointer is done by the DNA host ( nothing to do with your host )… As well as a 301 is accomplished at server degree.. Again, has nothing to do with " file access"…

In order to my knowledge, really no means of knowing how soon search engines like google will make adjustments… But I’ve viewed google rewrite his or her indexes on many 301’s in as small as 4 days… And those 301’s had been redirecting from 1 site to a completely different site for a different server from a different location.

Depends on the 301 and how we set it way up. If the call is made via scripting, then the letter to the old domain could be logged. If I need to know this information (and MY SPOUSE AND I usually don’t), I build the old domain as a entry in IIS with outright an index article, a 404 web page, and a little include page to complete redirecting and a few other functions. As long like a call is made including a status is made a comeback, an entry will be logged. Mind a person, this is the most obscure way to complete things and I only do it in limited situation. It’s also not particularly crucial to log this targeted visitors, either… the important part probably is the 301.

As long as the rewriting regarding indexes, I’ve seen them take anywhere from a day to 5 months subject to the page appearing redirected. So of course, there is no way of knowing. Webzarus drops mad knowledge within the community yet again.

One site WHEN I manage ( the organization has 40+ domains " internationalized" ) and wanted to know how some people might be typing in one of the. mx. ru. corp. uk etc……

WE basically created Cnames regarding WW3, WW4, WW5 ext within the main domain. com,

Subsequently set the " particular headers" on the server… and a very simple script that looks for any of these request… ( with out a referrer).. And fire wood them… Then redirecting them on the main page regarding ". com"…

Then a simple forward to the particular cName address.

Will not hurt search field… As the internet site could never be indexed by any using this… Only the main page on the site has the script to help log… Because we’re looking for Typed in URL traffic…

Currently top keyed in URLs are…. com,. jp,. corp. jp and. ru

I’ve done that at the same time, but not for TLDs… for misspellings with domains. 700 misspellings… 5 analysts were actually typed.

This entry was posted in Web Design and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *