I need suggestion for question.
HI
I have suggestion for many question.
1.will be different involving " url:www(.)domain(.)comand
" url:www(.)domain(.)com"
2.Once i search using like that " linksadURL target blocked:See forum rules)" i discovered less backlinks but once i search applying that procedure " url:www(.)domain(.)com" i found a lot of links, will be reason at the rear of that..
3.Once i Search applying that key phrases " Melrose Dealers Canada" throughout Google, WHEN I see close to 242, 000 for melrose jewelry wholesalers canada.(0.32 seconds)
but once i move article 1, page 2 and so on that post found solely 323 list of, what their like that
4.Suppose we’ve found total 2000 backlinks for some of our website however report indicate only 600 links subsequently where is actually 1400 hyperlinks.
5.Once i Search applying " url:www(.)domain(.)com)" i discovered 911 final result but once i go a single page that will another web page then merely 100 Actualy data show..
I am wating with the answer with the above concern.
_______________________
conservatories Crops Machines
Formerly Posted by suforum HI
I want suggestion for many question.
1.will be different involving " url:www(.)domain(.)comand
" url:www(.)domain(.)com"
url:www(.)domain(.)com is definitely returning pages which contains the website name itself about the page and also has that keywords " LINK" with it.
The url:www(.)domain(.)com will be the real receive for acquiring backlinks.But the accurate is located as part of your google designer account.
Thanks.
In the beginning Posted by way of -Nick- link:www(.)domain(.)com it means in how many site u are linked and also this site must have been okayed by search engines means tose demonstrated website need google freindly
At first Posted through Worlds’slastword In the beginning Posted by -Nick- website link:www(.)domain(.)com that means in the number of site u were linked and also this site needs been sanctioned by search engine means tose demonstrated website should have google freindly uh simply no…as chip said, you will find a variation between " connection:www…" along with " connection:www…"
did everyone even take the time to read his