MY PARTNER AND I currently make web pages in notepad together with HTML but I know many make their sites in dreamweaver or other website development programs.
Whats the most effective way to make a site With a system or plain HTML CODE in notepad
Thanks for just about any replys.
We would say – out of previous comments about my web constructing in Frontpage, to use a wide selection of Dreamweaver, and Hand Coding i Notepad as well as other HTML Publishers:
i go with code & dreamweaver. calculates pretty well. basically want something predetermined, and i cant find it being a feature in dreamweaver, i check out code, but if its some code and dreamwevaer undoubtedly has the characteristic, obviously, i use dreamweaver. But my spouse and i use dreamweaver in the event that its just simpler to click the actual button then keying in the code
Personally i think so famous, getting my quote posted in a very new thread.
I hardcode all my stuff. Although dreamweaver provides some nice extras including the site map software. You can in addition implement CSS with no trouble unlike frontpage. Consequently I say apply both, but keep hardcode most of your use.
As in my own quote above can be seen the link regarding Edit Plus internet. editplus. com Its a great html editor pertaining to hardcode and has much a lazy mans cutting corners. For example the particular code is coloring coated and you can find little buttons to get quick tags similar to font and stand.
Here you are at the boards.
Bless you.
I’ve been wondering what many people use for some time now. I’ve got dreamweaver yet I hardly use it because I can’t ever seem to get things the way I want in order to and after slightly play around about it just now MY SPOUSE AND I still can’t.
Given that you can indent code plus its colour coded, its good personally (Apart from frontpage)
Notepad induces sloppy coding… so I urge people not to use it. If you’re only likely to use a text-editor – use a good one… heck, notepad cannot even read LF’s appropriately. Dreamweaver has some other great features, althought he just one I find I use chapter 13 is it’s built-in FTP features. Removes a whole stage in building a website.
Not convinced that Notepad encourages sloppy coding.
It lets you do the job to me although I often use Homesite nonetheless that’s almost entirely with the snippets and coloration coding.
As much as text editors in which " help" anyone complete tags or anything else. they are about just as much use as of which office paperclip and have a tendency to get in how all the time.
My method is always to modularise my code to ensure I don’t have to hand code everything each time but maintain absolute control over the code.
I use notepad to get everything, partly since Now i’m too lazy to set up dreamweaver and test it, and partly given that I’ve just generally done it with this. I tend to try to keep my own code clean nonetheless that’s just myself.
There are usually other code editors that color program code like Textpad, UltraEdit, MS Visual Studio, plus MS Visual Business. NET.
I’m with Brak during this one… Notepad doesn’t assist a great developer at almost all in proper formatting of code.
Notepad encourages sloppy code just like that a hammer encourages bent fingernails. Put either ones in the hands of the amateur and they don’t do the job properly.
I’m not saying that notepad is the most effective way to code but you’ll find too many developers on the market who’s knowledge associated with web development puts a stop to at inserting very pictures into WYSIWYG authors. Give them your blank page and ask them to do the identical thing and they won’t know where first.
I’ve met some people in forums that have created a fantastic site but can’t understand an easy instruction when they look for help debugging their particular code.
Maybe I’m investigating this through your programmers eyes but in case you are unable to recreate your Dreamweaver code yourself then you ain’t an internet developer.
Probably, but most people today use dreamweaver in code-only view. I use design vew here and there.. but just for simple creating things more rapidly. Notepad encourages slack coding because there isn’t a automatic tabbing, not any word-wrapping at EIGHTY chars, no highlighting for anything, merely nothing. I think you’re taking a look at things from an oversimplified standpoint. If you can reproduce identical results hand coding as possible in a WYSIWYG editor than I’ll offer you full credit to get either. It’s definitely not the tools, even so the final design in which matters. get angry any time people blatently underestimate all web requirements and compliance to help other browsers and os’s. Take www. buymusic. com when you are not using a new WINDOWS OS, WORLD WIDE WEB EXPLORER 5. 5+, you may not use the web-site. That’s just unnacceptable. Most sites that end up having compatability are composed using notepad because it’s simple to leave out there a < /> element, or improperly nest things.
True even so the case of lacking < /> tags is not consequence notepad but involving bad designers or debugging methods.
Personally Let me always design sites that are compatible across as many platforms as possible, hence the lack of flash plug-ins (my personalized pet hate). As a result My business is fastidious when it comes to closing my tags.
I’m not saying that there isn’t a place for WYSIWYG’s but a firm grounding with probably the most basic of editors is usually a valuable resource that i believe all designers needs to have.
My background can be network admin and also VB programming so obviously My organization is biased towards this notepad approach. My sites are typically mostly dynamic ASP websites so I just have to have to code a few in order to build the web site. This allows me to spend more time on each page ensuring its fuly debugged/compatible.
I just think that the majority of the WYSIWYG’s have a tendency to make code that is certainly rather verbose while it doesn’t ought to be. That is my own definition of sloppy code compared to incorrect code.
As much as the end product rather than the method being key into the design method, that is true but many times when there is a problem with the conclusion product (such as compatibility) the designer does not have the necessary information about his code to mend or maintain as well as efficiently. So in a very sense the method is vital as it makes certain the designer is fully in control of his page(s).
I always forget to help close my tags
However i catch em tho
At the time of dreamweaver, design/code may be the best 4 me, but u cant actually see them equally good if u have them at that setting
I also accept the Dreamweaver/handcode blend. I have discovered alot of moat people that have resisted using Dreamweaver are usually still making identical sites repeatedly. Dreamweaver does allow you some freedom because it chops alot of their time off of your current design schedule, and like others have mentioned code view lets you write your own code too so in my opinion its the merely choice for someone doing web design professionally.
I not encourage implementing NotePad for something. It’s not an actual editor – seeing that Brak said that can’t even take care of non-CRLF -linefeeds. Certain, some people think it’s so very l333333t to convey " Hey, I made this along with just NotePad!! ".. but these are the same people that call HTML a new programming language.
Certain, every developer should be able to debug their handy work – but they need to also manage to use the right tools for the job. Syntax highlighting editors, ImageReady, Dreamweaver – these are the essentials of a web designers toolbox.
Including the console FTP application offered by Home windows, NotePad is limited to those situations where you’ll find no alternatives.
Mossoi,
Extra browsers support unclosed tags as compared to support DHTML. Your whole site (blue lobster) is predicated upon DIVs. When you are going to lecture in relation to compatibility, maybe you ought to practice it improved; -)
I’m not suggesting are actually any less meticulous than you claim to become, but the basis to your arguement is a lttle bit off.
Additionally, if a beautifully capable coder that’s admittedly less fastidious than yourself uses a tool to assist him or her in closing his tags, sobeit. The end result is what’s biggest.
That may be my point. Not that Notepad is usually any better and also that my sites are 100% similar value but that notepad isn’t going to breed sloppy signal. It gives brands feedom to hang themselves once they don’t know what there’re doing – but the designer makes the actual sloppy code. You can not blame the tools to the output.
I’m just frustrated of looking by means of forums and chat rooms and seeing exactly the same old problems. Instance:
Q: Why won’t the pictures display
SOME SORT OF: Check your < img src> tags are pointing towards the right directory.
Q: < img src> what is actually that
SOME SORT OF: Where have everyone saved your site
Q: In dreamweaver
Thanks a ton Dreamweaver, another cretin who seem to doesn’t even learn file structure it is polluting the Net with yet additional rubbish.
Now i am not knocking Dreamweaver, it’s really a great tool from the right hands, however if anything breeds ‘sloppy’ computer code that’s your guy.
The using Dreamweaver (or any other editor) doesn’t determine the skill level of its customer. People who complain regarding basic HTML problems haven’t any knowledge of the language in the least. They are utilizing Dreamweaver’s WYSIWYG editor and also have no concept of how to script HTML in a very text-based IDE. There are numerous examples of people for this forum who have exceptional perception of HTML, but still use Dreamweaver for the text-editor.
Exercise use Microsoft VisualStudio. WEB as my IDE regarding HTML editing (and XML, XSD,