Perhaps there is some prejudice towards designers who work with Dreamweaver, Golive, etc I see a lot of posts bashing them. Is there any reason for this
10-12 years ago i wrote sites using strictly text editors and when i remember appropriately, i sucked whenever it came towards the artistic aspect, however i knew this code fairly good.
Maybe 3 a few months ago i started messing around having Dreamweaver 8 and found this really is helped with my lack of artistic ability. I’ve was required to learn CSS and i’m implementing PHP and other languages women and men ability to discover the code translated immediatly helps considerably.
If you understand how to write HTML, next the WYSIWYG publishers are alright. The biggest explanation people bash them is a result of design view. If you ever rely solely about the design view, plus let the manager generate the HTML PAGE, then the code is crap. The majority of the WYSIWYG editors create bloated code if you ever let it.
Privately, I use DW8, in split view. I don’t mess with all the design view except next time i am looking to get a particular section in the code. When it comes right down to structuring the facet, I use this code view in addition to do the coding myself.
I make use of DW8 too, but 100 % coding view. DW helps (much just like dedicated HTML-text editors) in making sure I close my tags in addition to helps organize simply by collapsing sections involving text. But basically didn’t have DW in addition to was told to figureout on another pc, I’d happily grab notepad and have to work.
Another reasons why people don’t such as Design-View WYSIWYG is because it usually generates " tag soup", unsemantic plus unorganized text. DW, one example is, will often generate new span tags by using class names like " class1", that is certainly far less structured than " redtext" which in turn a coding-view artist would use. That is also often dirty and bloats that filesize. And not to mention the difficulty in performing exercises lower-level bugs — some problems are usually only visible from the text and not necessarily in design watch.
Many do deserve to have bashed because of their lazyness to find out the bricks along with cement of website development, but rather choose to get the sleepy architect which just tells his / her men " I’d prefer a three bedroom house in a very T shape while using living room while in the center".
Dreamweaver serves as a great program, but plenty of people use it so that they could easily help make layouts with dining tables. I use make use of DW8 because I like the split opinions. But when I bought into more advenced products, such as making use of css layouts. I stop with it because it at times it renders in ways that no some other browser does. Additionally, I found i work better having a more simple program.
for a short time, I been using notepad++. Its a great program too. I been with it for most with my webdesigning profession since I began using css. but now My organization is using Intype, that is certainly currently free, but planning to cost money quickly. It has any clean simple user interface. My favorite feature usually it has auto completion (which MY SPOUSE AND I beleave DW8 has) so Possible type " doctype" next hit tab, I select which doctype I’d prefer, then it save me time ripping it off considered one of my old internet websites.
Yep, using tables become less complicated in a WYSIWYG publisher, and a lots of people are tempted to make use of them for layout as an alternative to CSS. Thus your " DW" symptoms.
The first thing I didn’t mention yet… people overuse special things in people editors that do not really exist inside HTML, but will be JS snippets as well as stuff. Like " layers", " behaviors", plus " rollover buttons". If people never see the particular code, they will not likely notice the one hundred dollars lines of JS that editor had slapped with. Eventually this is why people don’t like users of WYSIWYG writers: they like in order to ask, excuse myself, stupid questions. They do not understand that the net doesn’t change together with their editor — they often obtain impression that their particular editor is " powerful" with features " not available in HTML", and sometimes they end up overusing those capabilities.
Anecdote:
I remember some sort of discussion about the most effective way to make rollover buttons. Some suggested tiny JS preloaders, many CSS attributes, a lot of hacks and things. Then this you guy came within and said " thats straightforward! My whole web page uses rollover switches, use Dreamweaver!! 111oneone" and sure enough his entire web page had rollovers everywhere… and he asked why his home page (which was an amazing 2. 5mb) charged slowly.
The situation with WYSIWYG may be the same everywhere: it can rarely generate very good code. I have nothing against those that use it, however I always suggest they stop, because you can’t get any kind of understanding of what’s on line with WYSIWYG.
Privately, I use ViM. I can move around documents in buying it extremely fast, and I have been previously doing this prolonged enough where We can generally find my way by way of a document. As for the visual aspect — I try to visualize in Inkscape or a few other graphics program earliest, and then switch that into XHTML+CSS. While somewhat slower, it’s an technique that works quite well with luck, though I still can’t visualize especially well.
WYSIWYG authors do generate " grubby code". I do not think that people about here bash them (unless you discuss Frontpage).
We’ve nothing against Dreamweaver myself or maybe Go Live. They integrate nicely with all the other Adobe in addition to Macromedia products.
I do agree when you are designing solely within WYSIWYG view, then you’ll have problems.
Just examining the advice during this one shows that will nobody bashes the item, they all simply just use different techniques or programs.
Additionally, if you tend to be learning CSS as well as PHP, you will rapidly realize DW isn’t planning to be an matter.
Good luck………
WYSIWYG will not be yet intelligent enough to style code. Currently they code just like you add new elements. In my thoughts and opinions they shouldn’t. There really should be a " rule it" button when you’re done. This way they’ll separate individual elements on the page and crank out better code.
Furthermore anyone with no understanding of coding could develop what dreamweaver offers you if they set up a week with hard studying.
WYSIWYGs are great for some things. DW plus GoLive both include integrated file supervision and FTP