Greetings,
i’m currently starting considering doing a design portfolio for personally after doing several freelance work plus was wondering whenever anyone had any ideas on the a good portfolio should look like (or what this should contain)
any links for you to good portfolios for ideas will be grand.
kind regards
http: //cssmania. com/topics/web-design/freelance-portfolios/
http: //www. cssbeauty. com/cgi-bin/mt/tags. cgitags=agency
et cetera…
In my opinion, CSS is nice and all, but it can be " design to get designers" if anyone ask me.
An excellent portfolio should become created in Display, and created VERY WELL. Good Flash pattern is something of which everyone can recognize the value of.
Commence with a unique plan, and work from there.
Im currently redesigning my own portfolio in Expensive. The concept revolves around paper airplanes. I’ll post them here when I’m done.
who said he must do it in css! i merely gave him internet site for " ideas"… with a perception you can create whatever you wish: css, flash, whatsoever.
Gotcha… I guess I figured were you to pushing CSS-only web sites, cause of the " css*. com" brands.: -P
That only fyi Transio, but did you know what I see while i visit a thumb only website. THE blank screen that is certainly what. I work in a building where many of the computers are with a secured network guiding a firewall as well as flash objects tend to be just blocked absolutely no argument. If I really need something on any flash site, I must go out from the building I’m within, walk next door start the lounge and attempt to get on among the only two computers within the company that won’t be on company multilevel. This I need to tell you, Relating to only done as soon as, and it wasn’t worthwhile, so I probably won’t be doing the item again. Most belonging to the design companies I know operate their networks using this method.
Just something considering.
Sure, most people can appreciate great Flash design, nevertheless the implication there usually not everyone can appreciate good CSS design, which is far from the truth. Flash and CSS will be technologies. The person who sees your website could care less whether it’s done in Adobe flash or CSS; what matters to them is that it look nice. While certain consequences possible with Flash are not yet doable by using XHTML+CSS+JS, we’re having there, and a snazzy site is usually created in XHTML+CSS+JS extra easily nowadays by using libraries like dojo as well as script. aculo. you than before.
There’s no point in mastering Flash (and dishing out the amount of money for it) if you’re comfortable making good designs in XHTML+CSS(+JS). It’s actually a matter of personalized preference, I feel.
Definitely something considering. By using Thumb, you’re decreasing your niche. Probably only 75% on the people thinking about purchasing websites will possess Flash enabled. But for those who have a really very good Flash portfolio, I’d say it’s probably a minimum of 2x as effective for a static portfolio (just from my experience). That means, it’s going to give you at lowest 50% better final results. In my own experience, when carried out well, a Flash site can produce 10x + more leads than a " plain" web page.
Of program it’s true. Great design throughout any medium could be appreciated by brands, but the basic masses are drawn towards the latest, most spectacular sorts of entertainment. This might be observed in many industries.
Specifically. And cinema and also stage acting are sorts of entertainment… why can you think most people prefer planning to the movies versus the theater, though
That’s like declaring all that things to exotic car buyers is that a Ferrari appears to be nice, and not really that it’s really fun to commute.
Number 1 will be accessibility, followed strongly by marketing as well as price. There will be movie theaters almost everywhere. Marketing for movie channels is extensive. As well as the price for the movie is somewhat low, especially compared to the bigger stage productions. There’s also the situation of immersion of the senses — movies are usually louder, amongst alternative activities.
That’s as well as the fact so it looks like theatre includes a little stigma as much as being the venue of the intelligentsia, which should be by virtue associated with people believing it’s. That example, I do believe, is flawed.
Zero, that’s like saying that all that matters to a common person which accidentally runs right Ferrari is who’s looks nice. As well as, most of enough time, that’s the instance. The exotic car buyer is really a specialist — very similar to a designer in our case. We’re tallking more concerning the masses than this specialists.
(Sorry to pull this place out of arrangement. )
Great design throughout any medium could be appreciated by any individual. The designer may well appreciate, for instance, the difficulty involving achieving said design and style, but what really matters to the layperson is the end result.
The center of the latest, most spectacular sorts of entertainment, TV drama still is apparently going strong, since does soccer, but they’re sorts of entertainment that are old when compared to, say, reality tv set. The latest, most spectacular form of entertainment has a plus in that it gets an initial oh! That’s great! ‘, but in the end the advantage is equalized by the maturity of any technology.
Also, Flash isn’t *exactly* a whole new technology here… It’s been around what, 8-10 years now Especially making the pace of technology inside computing world, that’s definitely not new.
- People can’t stand movies better due to marketing or price or stigma. On the contrary, movies are extra heavily marketed and less costly because they employ a bigger audience.
- My analogy ended up being correct – We were relating the Ferrari buyer for your potential clients. Even so, the analogy holds to the general masses at the same time. People love Ferrari on account of their F1 heritage. Enzo Ferrari designed his legend throughout racing. The 206/246 Dino, actually, was one Ferrari this was considered a bit of a " flop" – mostly attributed to that it was underpowered (by any Fiat engine, way too, iirc). Many people contemplate it to be the most wonderful Ferrari ever produced, but its resale benefit today is lower than most other F-cars belonging to the day.
- Aesthetic elegance is subjective. Great design can be unappealing to some people. Let’s consider possible of Pei’s pyramids for the Louvre. The neo-egyptian ultra