Now i’m using frontpage to make my first " business" web page for someone… I’ve never used frontpage to make my entire site, let alone a few pages, but I’ve lately noticed the thing at the bottom that tells you how far it takes to get someone to weight a page… The idea says that, during 56 kbps, it would take 39 just a few seconds… now, I’m certainly not TOTALLY finished the actual page yet, but I dont have additional… To be safe and sound, lets say this said 45 seconds while i completely finished the actual page: is this an appropriate period Obviously, not a lot of people have interenet cable connections as slow because 56 kbps in todays world, yet its all distant relative….. So, would you say this is an acceptable page size What exactly is an acceptable period (at which speed) per page
After this question receives answered, I have got a related question Cover post about loading pictures…. Thanks in advance for every help you might possibly provide.
What!
Personally, have never made use of Frontpage, so We are not familar with this particular " how lengthy a page takes" thingy.. is that this calculated by Frontpage or a server aspect script
45 seconds is concerning 5 times above the maximum moment people will look forward to a page to be able to download and make.
They say you have 10 seconds, furthermore, the. Net magazine had articles stating some canadian higher education had found that users composed their mind on the particular webpage inside. 5 of a 2nd, but anyway.
Your page can’t take that prolonged.
What’s the file size
Change: Maybe some options are off-setting these times feature..
its calculated by Frontpage alone…. And, remember, that time is at 56 kbps… that is ATLEAST 5 times SLOWER versus the average internet consumer is using today…
The page (index. htm) document is 4kb, the navigation pub (inclding 8 tailor made buttons) will overall about 56kb, as well as the background is your jpg file with 115kb. It is within jpeg because its a scenic picture and should look its best.
Therefore.. the question is an acronym,, but altered…. is the size on the page acceptable from 175kb What will be the maximum acceptable site size
The background’s too significant size-wise.
Of course, the background is too big. Without seeing this navigation bar, I’m guessing may capable of superior compression or something while they rarely take up a whole lot of space.
Weaken or blur this background more; if it’s the background, it isn’t as important as the content images.
which file format must i use then I need to keep quality, and Ive alredy shrunk it about I’m comfortable using.
the center of the navigation pub, I have been able to shring it because of a total regarding about 30-32 kb.
therefore… thoughts on this kind of now
Not having seeing the shots or page, it may not be possible to advise anything.
mm… ill have it up on the net in a full week or so…. until then, i cant carry out much.. so, ill move ahead to my different question..
Ive read about preloaded images and also Im interested… Ive got 3 pages that will each contain any thumbnail of 8-10 photographs which, when clicked, will get into to its 100 % size in another page. Full size is going to be about 1024×768, or possibly the next standard size down… in any event, I’d like to own those thumbnails load at once. How would I use this if I had at the same time at, say 314×209 Is definitely preloading those images while for a different page, one of the best idea
When i was younger the recommended web site size was around 30K total for anyone graphics and word. By today’s requirements it’s gotta be more achieable. Does anyone determine what the general consensus is for this.