Tag Archives: Afaik

Do I have to pay to put (TM)?

Posted on November 24, 2012 by admin537 views

We have one nice slogan or maybe word or whatever, and I never want other lazy copykat to make use of it. Can I just put the (TM) symbol near it without paying, registering, for example anything Thnx I believe using TM without the proper licensing is actually illegal AFAIK. Opt for the symbol (alt+0169), thats acceptable! You implement the TM image for anything that’s not previously trademarked and may be legally trademarked. You can’t use the documented trademark symbol, nonetheless. The registered trademark symbol is a (R) symbol, right So I’ll do something such as: ThisIsMyStupid And Boring Slogan So you Can’t CopyIt (TM). Acceptable, sorry, got everthing wrong lol: -P The documented trademark symbol is a (r) symbol, try www. webmonkey. com to learn the html coding for it. Yes, presented nobody has used it. It is legally better to register that, but as by using patents and copyrights, you’ll die connected with natural causes before it takes effect. Or at the least your site can have changed. The context is often a matter of years. As a make any difference of fact you should prove that you might have been using the phrase befor an individual regester … Continue reading →

Posted in Web Design | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Frontpage vs. Dreamweaver..The Battle Rages On

Posted on September 25, 2012 by admin474 views

Frequent I’ve heard precisely how inferior FP should be to DW, how " real" web-developers do not use FP. Nonetheless… both are WYSIWYG uses. Both allow one to hand code, in the event you wish. And because of the looks of that FP 2003 beta, it appears Microsoft is building a considerable attempt that will eat into a number Macromedia’s market promote. Complaints about FP’s excessive and proprietary code have also been addressed, it appears. I’ve seen excellent commercial sites produced with FP. So, as a FP customer, why do MY PARTNER AND I still have the inferiority complex Never get me erroneous, I think DW fantastic product. BUT, have I been told almost all these years to avoid FP even if DW is considered the " hipper" instrument OR, can DW make it happen much more when compared with FP Are you at that high of a disadvantage professionally books use FP as an alternative to DW WDFers good off… You’re missing a significant point… 90% of developers usually do not use Dreamweaver’s WYSIWYG conclusion.. they use the actual code-only view. POST only use dreamweaver simply because: a) I failed to have ot pay for it b) FILE TRANSFER … Continue reading →

Posted in Web Design | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Are IFRAMES safe?

Posted on September 18, 2012 by admin572 views

This is certainly my first posting. I’d like to express Hello to everybody and hopefully I could help out all-around here: glasses:. Something I’ve never seriously liked about standard website design is your typical setup where by different sections are seperated inside their own HTML web pages. A user in that case switches sections by say About Us to contact Us with most of your sitelinks. Somewhere around 50% of your respective website is in that case reloaded, your browser goes blank and reloads your subject matter, you see this ugly place card owner images, etc.. So I’m designing my websites to be effective in other methods, either by having a DIV and next assigning it’s " src" which includes a javascript routine, or an easy method to do this is to use your IFRAME, which it is possible to reload dynamically making use of javascript. Also, this lets you have your dynamically packed HTML in seperate documents, which is unattainable with my DIV/javascript process (afaik). Without you place all your current HTML directly in the javascript for any page. What I’m looking for out is if I should trust my websites in these methods, because maybe this IFRAME and/or … Continue reading →

Posted in Web Design | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment