This article through the Register is worth a look:
http: //www. theregister. com/2004/04/14/websites_fail_disabled/
Basically a current survey found that just about all web sites bust the rules for access for your disabled and come in fact in breach in the law.
It’s worth a look because if any kind of legal action comes after from these varieties of reports (which I’m sure eventually it will as a growing number of companies swap classic communication methods around favour of websites) potential clients might be very hot on finding designers who definitely have a track history for designing offered sites.
To tell the truth i think that once they sue over something like that then it is silly. I thought in IE6 there’s something that makes font much larger, if not about the other end disabled people could get screen magnifyers, view it in a very larger resolution.
It discusses the alt label, i personally use it, but i don’t see the situation if a custom made doesn’t. it is important if the picture has some signifcance on the context, or when you’ve got a picture for just a navigational button
and also this quote i uncover funny
messy and complex internet page structures disadvantage all people. It seems to my opinion that what this specific report is campaigning to get is white backdrop, black text. With big clear pictures. It takes away the idea of webdesign. A complex design may also be what is have to have.
That is probably down to bad design as an alternative to intentional breaches.
There’s no doubt that the report is usually a farse. It is interested in idealic web design. Where everypage is written in perfect code. This can not always happen, especially when there are numerous average home users having a crack at making a webpage. I think these kinds of report writers ought to lighten up
Well that is a big issue in my opinion. Is it truly fair for companies available discounts to people that order online, or to demand heavily for helplines to help force people towards using online assist and faq’s and don’t have a site that could be accessed by all
Webpage design is the maximum amount of about creating a product or service that is suited towards the job than it really is about making elegant sites. Far too many webdesigners ignore the following and make sites which are just not well designed while they may include ‘wow’ factor. It’s actually not all about seems.
Font size is a small piece of web accessability. As an illustration, what if anybody accessing your page is blind How it looks challenged people utilize web readers to be able to read the info on the website. Alt tags will be what the packages read (I think). Additionally, there are different levels of video or graphic disabilities, some where font size matters not.
Read this thread for some insight into the problem:
http: //www. webdesignforums. net/showthread. phps=& threadid=10850
Other than the alt feature for images in addition to good organization connected with content, I personally discover accessibility on websites to be foolish. Specifically, I get variable font shapes silly. If anyone has poor look, (s)he will more than likely be using magnifying glass, or some similar tool that can allow him/her to zoom in upon EVERYTHING on his/her monitor.
I choose to enlarge the text for a site depending on what lengths from my screen I am sitting purely with regard to comfort and I don’t would like to use a magnifying glass. There is additional to it compared to just zooming text though. What about colour contrast and going images or sounds that can not be turned off along with mask a text reader for instance JAWS
I are likely to agree with this specific. While I tend to utilise the ALT tags with regard to menu and graphic images (primarily intended for search engines), I don’t believe every single needs to have an ALT description, because many are usually spacers and skills and things. Other than, there are many degrees of ideas difficulty and blindness, like colour blindness, that it is impossible to design a site so that those who have a vision difficulty can read the idea. I’ve even learn somewhere that there are people who won’t be able to read black text for a white background. Find out how to cope with similar to that (Well, brother filburt your hippie has sort of thought of way with the light text, however even then… )
The one thing I do accept mossoi on is the issue of vary. The one that tends so that me is easy grey text with a white background. While it does tend to seem more visually interesting than its black counterpart, the grey text continues to significantly harder to be able to read for many people; enough, Personally i think, not to help it become worthwhile to complete so.
Finish of it . that really scares me personally (from a Canadian issue of view) is that if someone did choose to sue. We live in age rampant stupidity as well as nuisance lawsuits, and things like this that you should thrown out of court find themselves costing some poor guy hundreds of thousands of dollars simply because he didn’t make use of the Arial font about his site and several nearly blind male can only learn Arial or a thing equally dumb. McDonald’s very hot coffee, part 2. That’s what MY SPOUSE AND I see coming.
Plus here’s something otherwise from that content, that I merely noticed:
Hmm… we will see here. I really should cater to the dyslexic people.
That will Website This Delightful. Visit Thank An individual Foring. Sell Goods Audio Related To-We Auto and Car.
Not any offense to dyslexic folks, since I do realize it’s really a serious condition, but how is anyone supposed to write something for many who mix up terms and their symbolism, and end ” up ” sacrificing usability to the vast majority And why are such things as this only a dilemma for websites without every other computer program out there " Oh our god, Simply Accounting is just not Braille-friendly. Get to figureout on the spot. Come on, rush up. WE MUST CATER TO THIS BLIND ACCOUNTANTS AROUND! "
Offer me a freakin’ break. If this like thing continues, I’d like to get from the planet.
Alright… web sites are usually visual devices… find out how to design it for the hearing impaired!!! Sure, I do realize it means when you’ve got a vocal good file (i. age. a lecture) you ought to have a transcript connected with it, but the idea still sounds mindless…
Dammit, person, I can’t pick up you! filburt ought to really turn this textual volume up. Us people who’re half-deaf from using Jimmy, Mark, and classic good ole’ can’t hear what you just typed.
(I’m gonna get some real mileage outside of this. )
There’s