I’m new to web page design so this question might seem silly, but I need a little bit of help here. Just what content management system, a simple definition
I recognize that WordPress, Joomla for example. are considered so , because, let’s take WP as one example, it is easy for that author of as well as to make changes and add entries, etc.
So here’s my concern: what if you design a web site in dreamweaver for any client, who let’s say wishes to occassionally have the ability to add ‘news’ bits onto the house page along together with an image or maybe two
I think one solution is to use WP and also to give the web-site a non-blog feel/design.
Another solution, which I’m undecided how it’d seriously work, is to say have a very log in page right on the webpage. A user firewood in (user/pass recorded in SQL as well as MySQL db) in addition to somehow uses your ‘form’ to redesign a page. Maybe the form will contain a drop down list dried up pages that exist on the webpage, user chooses just one, fills in the shape with content, uploads a good image, and clicks on ‘Enter’ press button. When this goes on, ‘somehow’ the page gets updated. I guess ‘somehow’ would be connecting to the actual db and including this new obtain, etc. I have more details below. Also, how can this kind of be programmed I’m acquainted with. NET currently.
So, is there another solution Remember, I’m thinking of an very simple process for user to create updates.
Haha, and please don’t make fun. It’s hard coming in from a hardcore programmer background plus be lost during this ‘type’ of programming (type == internet applications/cms/design etc).
P. AZINES. please go into just as much detail as possible, esp. people here who definitely have designed one as well as have used WP to be a solution. I’m organization using WP for my own site to relieve into this full thing, but I have to design a modest site with functionality for dad. His site would contain several pages, i. e. about, contact, for example., and the third page would be a login page, kind of like I described. So it’s part page and part website application. How would you merge the not one but two together
There is no such thing to be a content management process. All there are is more or less complex layout supervision apps.
To recognise content management techniques, check out that " content strategy" website in my signature.
You desire a composer front end you can tie into your own existing layouts. Consider texty and cushy…. It’s what you would like.
Use Squidoo. It will present your clients with a lot more value than a very very basic CMS.
You should look to your immediate future. Will your client really reap the benefits of a really straightforward CMS Or would likely they benefit more originating from a CMS which is constantly being improved as well as developed
In the event you understand. net you will be able to understand the basics of the CMS. You just need to store and call data coming from a database.
Definitely Jason (& DC)
Thanks for any responses. Your response makes plenty of sense to me personally, Jason. And certainly, I have been handling. net 1. 1 for over Six months,. NET 2. 0 with regard to 2-3 months. When i was thinking about this, a CMS simply appears to be storing and calling data coming from a db, like you’ve mentioned above. I was somehow so that it is more complicated than it appears to be.
Building a CMS is a great learning experience, the simplest way to approach it really is to build it in layers. Focus on simple page supervision, then add consumer authentication, then bring registration, then bring site settings and so on etc. I find this technique of Agile development especially useful with regards to big complex beasts for instance CMS.
Yes, in user along with objective obliviousness. It’s unlikely that any manage content, or show anything however the least interest inside the user’s objectives pertaining to developing content.
Help make no mistake, a CMS is often a development tool regarding content. If everyone build one, stop treating it like a template support applet.
Are you saying content management tools is a bad thing
Good suggestion, Jason. It’s sorts of funny because I used to be kind of repeating this the weekend just before, in. NET SEVERAL. 5. By ‘this’, After all user authentication… I was received from the mindset of someone who would like to log proper site and nothing more. But certainly, this ties nice into a CMS, or well the vision which have of what it needs to be for a customer.
DC856, would you expand more on this Can you present specific examples, post. e. what problems do you have with say, Squidoo or Joomla
A problem by using Content Management Systems is that they are geared to do everything instead of focusing on particular customer goals.
This means that there will be features that the client doesn’t make use of. Sometimes these features will generate espenses. Its not great.
You also have to be careful what CMS get as well. Most are built by developers and lack UI experts serving out. Take Drupal by way of example. The admin -panel is cryptic and is known for a steep learning curve. (Though the upcoming version will remedy this). The WordPress admin panel alternatively while not perfect is finer.
The benefit regarding using commercial/open supply CMS is that they are always being made and improved. While your CMS shall be undeveloped. You know in adventures where you will find there’s spike filled pit and a moving platform that can carry you over the pit
I see popular CMS because the moving platform. Frustrate fixes, new features in addition to future releases are easy to get and install. Through providing a bespoke CMS, without a developer up to speed, the site stands still soon enough. If you try a popular CMS you cut on prices at both your own end and when you need it for the customer. What will the client should pay in the future to increase features to your own simple CMS
Creating a plugin for WordPress/Joomla/Drupal will be far quicker plus easier than developing a bespoke system.
Yep. Year in, 12 months out, there are content about why CMS implementations fail for person. And year in and out, not really a thing changes.
That shouldn’t matter. Developers installing the particular CMS can start or off quests, and make the particular CMS (at least the main one they’re familiar with) jump through hoops.
…. Aside from some pretty colorings and stock photography it doesn’t happen. It doesn’t occur because CMS installers don’t discover how a organization is growing, and possess zero concept associated with content strategy for you to project what the CMS ought to do, for which types of users.
Therefore most firms are generally CMS installers, not necessarily developers.
Just about every next version can remedy some " this" and also another.
Take into account the client’s techie culture. If they can’t insert bullets in a very Word doc, don’t expect somehow they’ll find out what Information Architecture is or what Details Designers do…. It simply isn’t gonna happen in a majority of companies.
The very ignorance about what technologies can do precludes the amount of extrapolation required pinpoint how the business’ technology needs will grow within future.
If you don’t know what a blog is, you aren’t going determine what you need is a Plog. … Not necessarily now….. Not annually from now…. Not necessarily five years by now.
Hearing the idea of blog doesn’t mean you already know what a blog really may be for.
Plogging For Completion Fess upwards. This thread would’ve gone on to get thirty pages devoid of anyone mentioning plogs, or knowing what a Plog is or how we use one.
Should you guys don’t learn, your clients ain’t gonna. So either start consulting about and developing Subject material Strategy, or throw in the towel on the bizarre notion you’re taking care of the client’s demands and future progress.
In way back when I have produced a CMS (content management system) to allow for a user to increase new pages / alter pages etc, increase images, text. The way this worked was only communicating with data in a very database via the use of forms – a few database tables or fields in a table would support the various page things. There may be other approaches to develop a CMS but that may be how I have done it before.
Geeze DC, stop beatin’ round the bush, tell em what you probably think.
Incredible, creating your individual CMS seems rather extreme. Even employing a full blown CMS does not answer this person’s question. There undoubtedly are a few good approaches to make it therefore a client can potentially add content to a website without going an entire global CMS path. Here’s a few more " simple" ideas to suit your needs…
The 1st one is any simplified CMS called iUpdateIt which i believe will do just what exactly this person originally asked for. It’s made to put in into a flat website like the Dreamweaver sites which are mentioned. You just decline a snippet of code on the site wherever you would like the client to update. And next, the client gets their own login and can use the web editing tool that works just like a word processor in order to add/remove things from other site. It can be useful for adding text, pictures, uploading files, etc…
One other idea is make use of a Blog similar to Blogger. Then, believe install feed software on the site. I use FeedBurner if you want to have it fairly seamless with a page, or WidgetBox if you’d like it to be in a very box with any slidebar. This is more if they want to prepare articles than complete more ornate additions with a site, but it works well.
Both of these types of options don’t require you to become programmer or find out a million things. Give ’em a try!