Formerly suffering with tinnitus hand coding the design and layout for my pages for a number of years. Is there a less arduous way to create web sites. I would think Microsoft or Adobe would have a real solution but apart from.
Just about any suggestions
Gives thanks,
J77
Photoshop really speeds up the design process.
In terms of coding, doing it manually is the best ways. There plenty connected with wysiwyg editors about though the code generated by them is extremely much hit along with miss. To optimise hand coding I’d personally suggest the pursuing.
> Word editor with syntax highlighting
> Word editor with auto-completion
> Create boiler plates, when i. e. ready to run stylesheets and html pages. This will save you plenty of moment.
Thanks with the info.
I’ll beef through to my Photoshop grinds for layout but I’m unsure how to " trace" over the JPEG or GIF images inside a text editor. I tried using Dreamweaver but it does’nt do because advertised. But it is good good to get file managment, creating hyper links plus FTP. I was hoping there seems to be a web authoring tool that actually worked.
J77
Generally there isn’t one. Doing it manually is probably the most reliable and wash way. WYSIWYG tools suck.
What does one mean by the following
What doesn’t DW do you want it to Since you are a experienced hand coder, DWcs3 should be perfect for you. If you set the doc type to what you need, then DW helps make the code really decent. So if you know how to side code, then you possibly can go into your code and tweak it for your liking. It has fantastic css management and simple to use, all coded accordingly. Sure, if you get into most of the dynamic elements using java script and spry, then possibly the code isn’t so great. But everything I’ve used away from DW works in IE6 and the rest of the browsers that We have tested. I don’t take action often, but Concerning used a spry palate, image swap, and changing pic box and in addition they all work very good. I keep studying how DW offers terrible code and I merely don’t get it. It’s a application. Use it, really don’t abuse it. When you ask me, it’s just a great tool for a skilled designer, not some sort of novice. Not which I’m a vet, nevertheless my sites usually are pretty clean employing DW.
Using an image of the layout, then dating over top implementing div boxes or maybe, god forbid, dining tables.
Last POST checked (admittedly, possibly not too recently) DW however used tables with places it actually shouldn’t and made use of really silly JS performs that don’t lower gracefully and employ nasty coding model (bad variable titles, etc) for accomplishing anything dynamic.
Well I’m not on the java script vocabulary so I would know any better. I understand in which. I try along with do everything through css when possible. Like I claimed, it’s a good application for the experienced designer which will go in in addition to fix some semantic elements. It’s the novices that may say " Whoa, look at the actual cool things I can do! " but not even realize they are creating bad value. Especially when them adds in-page css doing you hair like style1 in addition to style22. Yes, that’s terrible, but it happens when people sail and the wysiwyg and do not know any better. I spend almost all of my time throughout split view so I’ll monitor what’s taking place with the code next time i do something.
I’m sure I’ll catch quite a few crap for employing DW, I just don’t believe it’s the demon it truly is percieved to be.
With all accordingly, what do you use if you have some complicated javascript function with your site Code manually or do you use a program or maybe borrow a script
I code manually using jQuery, Prototype, or other sorts of JS library in which makes things good. It turns available, with those, most things you would use DW to do that DW could generate 40 traces of code with regard to, you can do in about three.