Furniture…
Use the slice tool with photoshop, import for you to dreamweaver, delete the particular white spaces, finish the net page.
CSS…
Use the slice tool with photoshop, create brand-new html document inside dreamweaver, spend X timeframe aligning and getting page to appear how you desire, then type content.
These days don’t get me wrong, i palm code everything my spouse and i do, using firefox " refresh" to see how its seeking each step. But CSS is more difficult work, especially if you are using dreamweaver.
These days for formatting CSS is usually king, it takes all of the effort out of changing text and also targetting elements.
For positioning though it can be a pain, i heard the particular one of its principal benefits is that you may easily redesign some sort of webpage by switching the style published. I would include disagree, it would be just as easy in any other case easier to platforms for layout, subsequently CSS for textual content and image format.
Exist any thoughts on this
: classic:
Look into this article aswell. Why tables for layout is stupid — problems defined, options offered
CSS could be the future, that’s for you to take the time to educate yourself it.
Bear in mind things CASCADE, and so any div, course, or p applies inside bigger div course or p. Sometimes changing the div to a span will resolve your problem, participate in around.
Here’s a sample for you… Say there is a client that message or calls you and pronounces, " I wish to add a section for the main navigation. " Note that isn’t a rhetorical tale, it really occurs! You now have to go into every page to incorporate this new part. If your site is conducted in tables, that means you must add a cell, and change the type and model of every cell in the row. If it is done in CSS, you change your width element on the buttons and any pages have happen to be adjusted (though you continue to need to add the newest button, but this is very easy w/ a copy/paste find/replace in the WYSIWYG).
" I don’t like that background colouring. " bodybackground-color: fff200 carried out and done, undoubtedly beats page attributes!
Quite simply, when you will work with small web-sites, no big deal to update everything, but that’s not the situation for most projects.
And up on other things: all-aroundness in layout, overlap. Furniture are grids. Everything has its place next to everything else. Such as text wrap may be very complicated around tables, easy w/ CSS. Overlapping graphics, impossible w/ conference tables, doable w/ CSS.
Quite simply, CSS is a tool. Yes, the understanding curve is steeper than tables, but why do people do it It’s a much better tool, there a variety of advantages to the item. It’s a action. As I reported before… it’s the near future.
Combination is the way to go. Most of plenty of time, I use table for your main layout and CSS with the other styling.
I’m not disagreeing with services CSS as mentioned above is true. On the other hand, in response into the original post’s problem, " Yes, CSS will always be more work. " I’ve done both CSS along with Table based styles. And if I want to get a job done quick, I tend to visit tables.
Setting up tables for the principle layout. Of training, other stylistic such things as background colors, I might use CSS.
So such as…
< body>
< div id=" wrap" >
< stand cellpadding=" 0" cellspacing=" 0" width=" 750" >
< tr>
< td colspan=" 2" id=" masthead" > masthead< /td>
< /tr>
< tr>
< td width=" 200" id=" side" > side< /td>
< td width=" 550" id=" main" > main< /td>
< /tr>
< tr>
< td colspan=" 2" id=" footer" > footer< /td>
< /tr>
< /table>
< /div>
See dozens of ids. I employ CSS to model the cells. And CSS the body background color, or anything else. The wrapping div is usually to CSS center format the page over the browser.
By no means do…
< stand bgcolor=" #ff0000" >
Otherwise you have the problem with maintenence as stated by others earlier mentioned.
And never use the < font> tag embedded as part of your HTML.
So I got the easy design of tables, combined with the maintability of CSS.
WE agree. Tables may not be evil, and these are great for tabular info. What you’ve described is something my personal teacher called some sort of " Container Dining room table. "
He said the newest trend in website design is to move table-less, but that is certainly retarded. Use conference tables for rows along with columns, like your primary layout. Stylize anything in CSS.
I might say, table is good for stucturing and layout and positioning physical objects in tabular data format. However, CSS can be used styles and formating items for visual powerpoint presentations. I would recommend you should employ CSS with nominal tables.
i’ve used both, and went by way of a period where my spouse and i used CSS possibly for tabular information. Really it was to see if possible. By doing which, i was able to learn enough related to positioning and floating elements, that now i will make just about any layout imaginable with CSS i always simply can’t with tables, through smart image slicing, keeping of background images, or anything else., so while the very structure is unavoidably field like, the outcome doesn’t have to seem like it, causing more interesting ALONG WITH standards compliant layouts.
we do use dining tables still, though only for organizing tabular data, as well since forms, simply because it’s much faster than looking for a ton involving divs spaced right. but even then the remainder of site and all of the stuff surrounding individuals tables are nearly invariably all CSS.
we haven’t used your table for structure in years, and i really don’t se emyself ever knowledge ?.