I have started using MS Word (office 2000) to develop a web web page. The problem I will be having is we have inserted a image into my page but should the cursor goes over it the limited hand doesn’t glimpse.
I have hyerlinked to it but it actually goes on the page I want, but the hands never appears — just my suggestion cursor.
Any help can be appreciated
I could be the first to state it: I really, very strongly suggest which you absolutely never employ Word (or any component of Office) to make web sites. The resulting rule is perpetually disorganized and always optimized pertaining to IE, regardless of the settings.
Rather, I would suggest Dreamweaver: http: //www. macromedia. com/dreamweaver/. These have a larger studying curve than Concept, but the rule it produces will be far cleaner plus more compatible–and also XHTML-compliant if you ever create a document as such.
I realize filburt’s advice.
In lieu of teaching how make use of the hammer that will cut wood, I’d direct you to definitely a better software.
Excuse my french but MS WORD is CRAP for website design…
IT is quite possibly one of many worst tools to use, as said on top of, and it can be horrible for addressing websites (for enhancing purposes).
Begin using WORD to update any HTML, this ruins the signal, and the design and style.
Stick to a WYSIWYG editor.
Use Notepad. MS Word may be for documents, not WEB CODING.
Do not really use Notepad either. Notepad is not really an editor, it serves one particular purpose: being some sort of note pad. A thought I have often expressed: using Notepad to generate your web pages isn’t going to make you virtually any smarter or sooner than using MSWORD. Sure, you write the code yourself and it’s unencumbered with proprietary MS tags — but why work with Notepad when there are highlighting editors (such as my favourite Circumstance – click to get feature list) with such things as smart tabs, multiple file tabbed modifying and regular phrase search& replace in which just make lifetime easier.
The belief that notepad comes together with all modern Windows versions isn’t going to justify why it should be your editor of preference. It should be rather depending on a rational option: can I produce HTML faster together with another editor or not.
To keep use Editplus 2, and nothing else regarding coding.
WHEN I use TextPad, although I became once forced to code an entirely site in Notepad, and it also wasnt nice. The best web site WE ever made seemed to be done in MICROSOFT Publisher, and it wasnt an amazing experience. I also often remember that towards the end of my anguish the pages weighed in for a modest 150KB lol.
Notepad provides improvement over MSWORD.
Notepad is no less " powerful" a tool than any of those other editors.
You only don’t have syntax coloring and goods.
Seems you are contradicting yourself. If there is an editor containing the highlights of Notepad plus some have a that makes your own editing easier, and Notepad would not have feature ANY, then by all logic Notepad is less powerful versus editor containing feature A in combination with Notepad’s capabilities.
Notepad includes set: Notepad
Manager A features fixed: Notepad, Feature A
Have a improves editing operation.
Hence:
Performance(Notepad) < Performance(Editor A).
I’m still willing to bet if I possibly could design the very same website with notepad as I possibly could with say… Editplus2. And I think some people here might make a better website than you are not Notepad. Same matches Editplus.
Neither you have anything special which will make a improved website. Thus IMHO, these are no more successful. Not saying one provides improvement over the other or even not, because MY PARTNER AND I find notepad rather useless now.