Howdy, am a first-time. am trying to style a website together with DW. the website should have the logo for the top of that page, the menus to the left handside and some graphics on the right handside. I’d want to keep the logo the only real still area from the site (therefore no realoading needs to be involved when working the menus) and the other two areas should load various menus and artwork. Is this any case of framesheets Might you please help me to get a relevant article any suggestion could be very appreciated. Thanks earlier. Davide
When would you like to load all the menus and graphics Feel free to use frames for including other html files as part of your page, although a lot of people hate frames. Or you should use a server aspect solution, like asp/php/cfm/jsp.
Remorseful I dont truly understand your search
If the photograph is loaded once it are not reloaded again in the following pages the way it will already be within the browser’s cache. So there really is you should not try and do what you’re up to (if I determine what that is) if you don’t are working that has a site with countless, many pages (which certainly you might be).
But as bfsog mentioned that can be done this with glasses or a server-side vocabulary, the latter being better choice.
many thanks for replying. good, at the leading of my html page there’s the business logo; on the quit hand side the main menu, on the proper hand side the flash animation; the footer is a company address. once you operate the key menu this need to load and replace the principle menu with some other menu (sub menu) as well as the flash animation with graphics tightly related to the sub list. I’d like to simplify coursesmart and keep the most notable (logo) always generally there avoiding to load it all the time I click this menu. Basically a single html page. Is it possible
Don’t work with frames, don’t work with frames, and avoid frames. BTW, you can’t use frames.
Acceptable. As Eddy Our bones mentioned, a header graphic much like the one you are describing will stay in the user’s computer’s cache so although it must reload in each page, it will not take all his time. So, don’t work with frames.
In addition to, if I could advise… From any usability standpoint, it could probably be better to provide a sub-nav (or reorganize the principle and sub navs) rather than removing the key nav. Reasoning: if the main navigation is replaced through the sub-nav, how is a user supposed to receive back
And back to your original dilemma, when you first be able to WDF, there’s site wide announcements and also right below this are tutorials. That would be a good place to appear. Or google it.
Personally i obtain frames very helpful to target the url to open in a particular frame in Goal Weave Mx all you’ve got to do is usually select it and also select the concentrate on drop down list inside properties menu. A good example is
world wide web. lovelandtenderyears. com (i hate the color scheme but customers get what they want) I have them set for you to load new pages in the " Main_Frame". As for menu’s dependant upon your expirence level I’d personally try and steer clear of java script navigation menu’s if you don’t do use frames they could be a pain in order to edit. (With frames you merely have to change one html internet page. )
Frames are the biggest mistake you can make in web designing (besides not surprisingly iframes). The only good use I’ve truly seen of structures is Kaliber10000.
The simplest way is to use CSS. The best place for your tutorial on Standards-Compliant web programming is W3Schools.
Frames tend to be more efficant all of which save work, occasion, and will produce changing insite links less of a challenge.
I can not stress simply how much time Frames own saved me in the past if you accomplish them right its not really an issue.
I do concur along on the iframes though.
Would some one otherwise kindly interject the opinon
Frames usually are not efficient. Search engines include trouble picking them up and they also mostly look ugly and they are major old university now. They were being in… in 1995!
if you don’t use frames sets correctly just as any other html page page
they are efficant coding wise
I wouldn’t say frames are ugly, I wouldn’t say they’re specifically inefficient, I will concur that they were popular inside mid-90s but the best reason I dislike frames has to do with usability.
Despite well considered navigation systems, many users still utilize the back button. Glasses and back buttons, they’re not pals. Also, many websites give anyone bread crumbs within the < title> but this may not happen together with frames. Someone mentioned that when browsing with frames, one only needs to update one web page. Well, when employing CSS, one only needs to update one document.
One reason eyeglasses became really popular was general health really decreased your load time regarding pages since only section of a page has been loaded, and this specific being the html code part, not the particular images. But, in the past ten years, better caching, and broadband have solved this concern.
However the biggest reason to not ever use frames… not many people still utilize them, if you’re just learning, go on and learn CSS, it isn’t that difficult, also it will better prepare you with the future.
That said, I’ll repeat just what I said previous to… Don’t use structures.
yes nevertheless , you can i repeat can title structures
I applied frames on my own first ever financial website, only because that is what was right now there before and I’d no idea what I used to be doing once.
Since that time, I’ve learned that search engines just don’t reconize glasses well. I re-designed a niche site for a client and also the week after it had been online web visits were up 60% plus we saw your 300% increase around referrals from engines like google. That’s just after a single week… and the prior framed sited has been online for Six months or more.
Use frames to be a crutch or easy way to avoid it. Dreamweaver features a thing called a " template" where you can create a template and still have an editable area in your text in any cell. This approach, if you produce change on something according to the site design, it will change automatically on all pages, rendering the principle advantage of frames (from a brands point of view) crappy.
Also, I just hate began seeing frames behave. I prefer to have the complete page scroll. Nonetheless that’s just us…