http: //pages. yahoo and google. com
I R Wp site designer, yay!
BAH!! they have already run from accounts!! I wonder if this should turn into the following google fad.. bear in mind the gmail craze
The good thing is they can’t ever fully replace the net designer, they might aim to portal and web theme their way all around it, but unless they remove the web completly i am here to remain..
hows the grade of the sites staying produced
I do not have a gmail consequently I can’t really look at the features, but it really sounds like both:
1- A drag and decline on par w/ geocities
2- What appeared to be that thing in which came bundled w/ Netscape about 8-10 issue COMPOSER! That’s what it had been called! Netscape Composer, ah… the good ol’ days to weeks!
" fad" Gmail could be the best!
But, yes, it appeared to be crazy watching people today buy invites like crazy on eBay. Continue to, I use Gmail pertaining to all my postal mail accounts and wouldn’t want it any other method.
Composer has been nice. I appreciated Composer.
Ok , i’ll open an account just fine (alanhogan. googlepages. com)
Look into the notes upon that page
Did you check out the code that generated! That’s loads of < head> in conversation with access!
Furthermore, it says it hacks for IE at Mac… really Not really much!
Therefore , the page looks o . k, but how is a interface Would an individual who doesn’t know the very first thing about HTML and CSS have the ability to produces something since smooth
Will not look too harmful code-wise.
But it appears as though they create styles for every single HTML tag you may want use even when you never intend on using them.
Furthermore, I don’t understand why it uses a new Strict document type when it’ll let people vacation with using unstrict coding businesses.
The interface is pretty pleasant.
Indeed! It’s got several errors itself, that aren’t my fault: I checked the code plus found < br> without any close tag, < hr> without any close tag, and < div> inside < h1>, or anything else., etc.
I’ve been fiddling for it a bit. You can see my experiment the following:
http: //glyakk. googlepages. com/home
WE gave it a try today. Damn simple to operate!
Structure based, but the CODE and CSS them build’s isn’t bad for a WYSIWYG editor. Think about your code the MS creates via Concept and Frontpage… now thats an actual mess!
For all those people wanting an online site without the mess of adverts and so forth, its pretty state-of-the-art example of current. And the themes the offer aren’t an excess of of an eyesore.: common: Newbies will really like it!
The test: http: //jasonbagley. googlepages. com/
Are you experiencing to bring to operate an effective dancing bananas.