I’ve noticed plenty of my sites look like pretty garbled upward when it’s seen using ie5/5. 5… Anything, else and they also all work fine. According to w3schools merely about 4% with poeple still employ ie5.
http: //www. w3schools. com/browsers/browsers_stats. asp
So… Do you design/code with ie5 as their intended purpose, or is the item a lost cause
Many thanks!
Nope. IE6 is actually my baseline, in the event I’m targetting IE (I usually am, though )
POST ignore it.
IE WDF cell phone browser breakdown for August 2006 (although not necessarily truly representative of your general population because designers will use alternative surfers and AWstats grossly underrepresents many stats, including hits):
wow, that copied terribly. Summary: IE 6TH, 40. 8%, IE SEVERAL, 3. 8%, all others less than 1%. Overall: IE 1 OUT OF 3. 2% and Firefox 38. 2% (! ). Additional notables: Safari A COUPLE OF. 4% and Opera A SINGLE. 1%. Netscape 4 less than 0. 01%… report. Konqueror only slightly more than NS4.
I actually much like the Opera rendering motor… I just loathe the browser which surrounds it.
In the months and many years, IE and Firefox were getting closer and also closer for WDF. I predict in the few months, Firefox will finally surpass IE… until IE7/Vista happens. But remember, like a technically knowledgable collection, most WDF users know about alternatives to IE and a lot of obviously elect to make use of them.
POST also ignore IE5 — making sites present properly in IE6 is actually hard enough. Thank God for any html> body hack…!
Normally when i create web internet sites, making sites improve both IE 6 in addition to Firefox is nicely easy enough. Then there are browsers that you must put the extra effort for getting it to job, such as Opera, Safari, Konqueror, in addition to Netscape Navigator.
Then, there are missing causes (as you mentioned) like IE 4, IE 5, and so on. IE 5. 5 for Mac is a whole lot worse. Whatever works within IE 6. 0/Win in addition to Firefox seems to break in IE A FEW. 5/Mac as properly as Safari (and persons wonder why WE hate Macintosh consequently much).
Yet, it all is determined by where you trim upon when designing website pages. Do you trim on CSS, and also Javascript, or both I usually use CSS with regard to my designs, but I not likely leave out Javascript with any page POST make (it’s for added effects and functionality-I’m all out for Web 2 . 0. 0, Ajax, internet applications, etc). Almost all of the Javascript done in website pages usually revolves around DOM together with DHTML. Safari as well as Konqueror’s support regarding DHTML is someplace hovering between nil and poor. Opera continues to be good, I reckon, but there really are a few differences by using IE6/Win and Firefox.
Then there’s the actual newest browser in the market, IE 7. Should you run a search on the search engines, you’ll probably come across numerous complaints with regards to hacks which backfire once they reach IE7, as IE7 has fixed several inconsistencies with CSS. MY SPOUSE AND I never encountered those people problems though, due to the fact I never definitely relied on hacks much. I kind of got around with out them.
Relating to found that Opera renders pages brilliantly, so long as you use valid XHTML and CSS. Actually, I have found not many differences between Opera and Firefox when they are both excellent browsers for standards-compliance.
IE6, even so, is very a great deal standards-compliant, and for this reason the ugly small business of ‘hacks’ is usually necessary. Although I have to say that that html> body hack is particularly brilliant, because if IE7 features indeed fixed the CSS support and then it should consider the selectors prefixed using html> body and make the page since it was originally intended (the same manner as it is definitely rendered in Opera / Firefox). The result being that that page looks the identical in IE6, IE7, Opera as well as Firefox. Brilliant!
Subsequently, as more and many more browsers move more detailed to decent web standards support, things will ‘just work’ along with CSS will look similar in any cell phone on any system. We can just dream…
The lawyer html> body seriously isn’t the only hack I got speaking about. There are various others, if you look into it the net like the underscore hack, which often backfired miserably, if I’m not wrongly recognized. Although I believe you that IE 6 just isn’t very standards compliant, again I have to emphasize that I got speaking Javascript good. There are a number of differences I get noticed before like those related to scrollHeight, scrollWidth et cetera, and during any time of Opera 8-10, it crashed all the time every time WHEN I used it for surfing (therefore I stay with my beloved Firefox).
You happen to be very right in saying you can easliy only dream. Such things wouldn’t happen, as each manufacturer keeps adding proprietary features to the browsers that generate things render diversely. Come to think of it, if everything rendered similar, would there often be competition, other as compared to performance and GUI
My personal mistake; the only hack I’ve ever endured to apply is usually html> body, for the reason that only differences I’ve were required to correct have also been CSS rendering problems in IE. That Opera features had JavaScript issues during the past doesn’t surprise me personally, seeing as it accustomed to weigh in at a mere 3. 5MB and also thereabouts. I do urge you not to prepare it off, in order to consider giving that another go, as I haven’t encountered any such problems in today’s feeting version (9. 0) and I work with it for my day-to-browsing. The customisation features usually are excellent, web standards help support is possibly the top around right now, and it will be closest that just about any browser has ever go to pure perfection*.
I believe you up to some point, but I’m nonetheless optimistic in hoping any particular one day the net will look the identical on any internet browser. Modern browsers are moving from the proprietary features in addition to embracing web models, and if that W3C get their act alongside the new draft in that case this new era with the web could arrive sooner than we expect.
* inside my opinion
Zero, in fact. And do you know what That’s how it really should be! The browser shouldn’t be competing for the weird features for designers, it ought to be competing for that useful features that carries for *users*. That’s like saying that Windows Media Player adds the latest feature to AUDIO files. No, WMP’s endeavor, just like Winamp’s, will be playing all Tunes correctly. The thing that really differentiates them